December 11, 2012

Original link

The Council meets in Regular Session in the Council Chambers this day at 4:00 p.m.

I.   DISCLOSURES

OF PECUNIARY INTEREST

Councillor D. Brown discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 13 of the 1st Report of the Civic Works Committee, having to do with the London Transit Commission Long Term Growth Plan Working Group, by indicating that that her employer has a contract with the London Transit Commission.  Councillor D. Brown further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 19 of the 30th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee, having to do with the 4th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage as it relates to the property known municipally as 75 Bathurst Street, by indicating that her employer owns property in close proximity to the subject property.  Councillor D. Brown also discloses a pecuniary interest in those parts of the 1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee dealing with the 2013 Budget related to the London Transit Commission, by indicating that her employer has a contract with the London Transit Commission.  Councillor D. Brown also discloses a pecuniary interest in Council Minutes of 19th Meeting, having to do with clause 5 of the 28th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee relating to 89 York Street, by indicating that her employer owns property in close proximity to the subject property.

Councillor P. Hubert discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 4 of the 1st Report of the Community and Protective Services Committee, having to do with the Purchase of Service Agreement for Ontario Works Employment Assistance Services, by indicating that he is the Executive Director of a social services agency that has dealings with Ontario Works. Councillor P. Hubert further discloses a pecuniary interest in those parts of the 1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee dealing with the 2013 Budget related to Ontario Works, by indicating that he is the Executive Director of a social services agency that has dealings with Ontario Works.

Councillor M. Brown discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 29 of the 30th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee and the related Bill No. 31 and Communications #1, having to do with the property located at 2095 Coronation Drive, by indicating that he owns property lives in close proximity to the subject property.

Councillor S.E. White discloses a pecuniary interest in those parts of the 1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee dealing with the 2013 Budget that relate to the London CAReS, by indicating that her employer is currently in negotiations with WOTCH, which receives funding from the City of London.

Councillor B. Polhill discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 21 of the 30th Report of the Planning and Environment Committee, having do with the application of London Property Corporation, relating to the property located at 124 St. James Street, by indicating that the property was the subject of an application before the Committee of Adjustment and that his son is a member of the Committee of Adjustment.

Councillor J.B Swan discloses a pecuniary interest in those parts of the 1st Report of the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee dealing with the 2013 Budget that relate to Orchestra London, by indicating that Orchestra London is his employer.  Councillor J.B. Swan further discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 8 of the 19th Report of the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee, having to do with the Music London Initiative, by indicating that the matter  relates to a proposed concert hall in the Downtown Core, which relates to his employer, Orchestra London.

Mayor J.F. Fontana discloses a pecuniary interest in clause 15 of the 32nd Report of the Finance and Administrative Services Committee and related Communication #3, having to do with a request for the Mayor to take a paid leave of absence.  Mayor J.F. Fontana further discloses a pecuniary interest in the Motion of Which Notice was Given, having to do with a options related to criminally charged or convicted elected officials.

Moved by Councillor D. Brown

Seconded by Councillor S.E. White

Approve that pursuant to section 7.4 of the Council Procedure By-law, the order of business BE CHANGED to permit consideration of clause 13 of the 32nd Report of the Finance and Administrative Services Committee, having to do with a financial plan for the acquisition of the London Normal School, 165 Elmwood Avenue East, to be heard at 5:15 PM.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor J.L. Baecher

Seconded by Councillor H.L Usher

Approve that pursuant to section 7.4 of the Council Procedure By-law, the order of business BE CHANGED in order to consider the Motion of Which Notice is Given with clause 15 of the 32nd Report of the Finance and Administrative Services Committee; and   that pursuant to section 7.4 of the Council Procedure By-law, the order of business BE CHANGED to permit consideration of clause 15 of the 32nd Report of the Finance and Administrative Services Committee, having to do with a request for the Mayor to take a paid leave of absence, to be heard after the 5:15 PM item and in camera session.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

II.   REVIEW OF CONFIDENTIAL MATTERS

TO BE CONSIDERED IN PUBLIC   None.

III.   ADDED

REPORTS

Moved by Councillor S.E. White

Seconded by Councillor P. Hubert

Approve the following additional reason to the in camera session:   “A matter pertaining to litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality; advice subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose, as it relates to leave of absence for a Member of Council.”

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

IV.   COMMITTEE

OF THE WHOLE, IN CAMERA

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor P. Hubert

Approve that Council rise and go into Committee of the Whole, in camera, for the purpose of considering the following:

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

V.   RECOGNITIONS

1.   Organizational Matters Update

Moved by Councillor H.L. Usher  that, as a procedural matter pursuant

Section 239 (6) of the Municipal Act, 2001, the following recommendation be forwarded to City Council for deliberation and a vote in public session:   That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Corporate Services & Chief Human Resources Officer, the contract with Tim L. Dobbie Consulting Ltd, dated August 13, 2012, BE AMENDED to increase the amount payable under the contract by up to an additional $75,000, exclusive of HST, and to extend the term of the contract for an additional three months up to June 13, 2013;   it being noted that the Finance and Administrative Services Committee heard a verbal update from the Managing Director, Corporate Services & Chief Human Resources Officer and T.L. Dobbie, Tim L. Dobbie Consulting Ltd. with respect to organizational matters.

VI.   CONFIRMATION

AND SIGNING OF THE MINUTES OF THE NINETEENTH MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 20, 2012

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor S.E. White

Approve the Minutes of the Nineteenth Meeting held on November 20, 2012.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

VII.   COMMUNICATIONS

AND PETITIONS

Moved by Councillor P. Hubert

Seconded by Councillor S.E. White

Approve referral of the following communications for consideration with the clauses noted:

2.   Update Dearness Matters

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

4.   Minutes of the 1st

Meeting of the County/City Liaison Committee

That the following actions be taken with respect to the Minutes of the 1st Meeting of the County/City Liaison Committee:   a)         the following actions be taken with respect to cost apportionment arrangements for social housing and land ambulance, renewal of agreements for the delivery of child care and Ontario Works and compensation for County roads:   i)          the Civic Administration for the City of London BE DIRECTED to continue to meet to negotiate a potential resolution towards renewing the service agreements between the County and the City for Social Housing, Ontario Works, Child Care and Land Ambulance services; and     ii)         consent BE GIVEN to mediation, if necessary, prior to taking any steps toward arbitration, with a view to a potential resolution towards renewing the service agreements between the County and the City for Social Housing, Ontario Works, Child Care and Land Ambulance services;   it being noted that the County/City Liaison Committee heard a presentation from the Chief Administrative Officer for the County of Middlesex and received a City of London staff report dated May 7, 2012, addressed to the City of London’s Finance and Administrative Services Committee, with respect to this matter;   b)         the County/City Liaison Committee’s terms of reference BE AMENDED to provide for a minimum of two meetings per year; and   c)         clauses 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 BE RECEIVED;

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

3.   Election of Vice-Chair for the term ending

November 30, 2013

That Councillor J.P. Bryant BE ELECTED as Vice Chair of the Corporate Services Committee for the term ending November 30, 2013.

IX.   REPORTS

13.   Extension of Term

for Jeff Brown to the London International Airport Board of Directors

That, on the recommendation of the London International Airport Board of Directors, the current appointment of Jeff Brown BE EXTENDED for two years effective August, 2014.

5.   Audit Planning

Report for the year ending December 31, 2012

That the attached KPMG LLP Audit Planning Report, for the year ending December 31, 2012, BE APPROVED; it being noted that, as required, the Members of the Audit Committee noted no instances of, actual, suspected or alleged fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations, including misconduct or unethical behaviour related to financial reporting or misappropriation of assets.

Moved by Councillor J.P. Bryant

Approve clauses 1 to 4, inclusive.

6.   Ontario Concrete Pipe Association

That it BE NOTED that Councillor D.G. Henderson advised the Investment and Economic Prosperity Committee that he is surveying developers to see what proposals they might be able to bring forward to add to the list of investment and economic prosperity proposals, at no cost to the City, in order to further London’s economic position.

7.   Grand Theatre Proposal

That the communication dated November 15, 2012, with respect to the Grand Theatre’s proposal for a Downtown concert hall, BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for review and assessment in developing its report back on the various investment and economic prosperity proposals.

9.   Industrial Lands

Review O-8014

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken regarding the Industrial Lands Review:   a)         the Industrial Lands Study, dated November 2012, and the associated staff report dated December 4, 2012 BE RECEIVED for information, and this information BE CIRCULATED for public and agency consultation; and   b)         following a public consultation process, Planning staff BE DIRECTED to prepare an Official Plan Amendment for the expansion of the Urban Growth Area for the designation of approximately 500 hectares of new Urban Reserve Industrial Growth lands;   it being noted that the Strategic Priorities and Policy Committee heard the attached presentation from Managing Director, Planning and City Planner and the Manager III, Land Use Planning Policy with respect to this matter.

10.   Consideration of

Appointment to the Argyle BIA Board of Management

That the following individuals BE APPOINTED to the Argyle BIA Board of Management for the term ending November 30, 2014:   -           Councillor B. Armstrong -           Jeff, Baggaley - Color Company       -           Brendan Colafranceschi - The Co-operators -           Scott Coulter - Coulter’s Pharmacy   -           Sandy Desmarais - CIBC Securities Inc        -           Peter DeMelo - Subway         -           Elissa Ielapi - Libro Financial Group   -           Brock Merrifield - Staples Canada Inc -           Bill Ross - M&M Meat Shops

11.   Appointment Recommendations for the London

Convention Centre Board of Directors

That the following actions be taken with respect to appointments to the London Convention Centre (LCC) Board of Directors:   a)         a second 3-year term for Jeannine Cookson, Fanshawe College and Dr. Ted Hewitt, UWO for the first two-years of the second term to run until November 30, 2014 BE APPROVED;   b) a second 2-year term for Michael Seabrook, CEO of the London International Airport for 2013 to November 30, 2014 BE APPROVED; and   c)         the appointment of Stephen Peters to the London Convention Centre Board of Directors for an initial two year term effective January 1, 2013 to November 30, 2014 BE APPROVED.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor J.B. Swan

Approve clauses 1 – 10, except clauses 7 and 8.

12.   London Police

Services Board

That the following actions be taken with respect to the Municipal Council’s appointment to the London Police Services Board:   a)         the communication dated November 22, 2012 from M. Deeb, Chair, London Police Services Board regarding the resignation of Mayor J. F.       Fontana from the London Police Services Board BE RECEIVED; and   b)         Councillor D. Brown BE APPOINTED to fill the vacancy on the London Police Services Board arising from the resignation of Mayor J.F. Fontana

14.   Property located at

3455 Morgan Crescent (H-8061)

That, on the recommendation of the Manager of Development Services and Planning Liaison, based on the application of Sifton Properties Limited, relating to the property located at 3455 Morgan Crescent, the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a Holding Residential R5/R6/R7 (h-h-53-R5-4/R6-5/R7-D100-H-30) Zone TO a Residential R5/R6/R7 (R5-4/R6-5/R7-D100-H-30) Zone, to remove the holding provisions.  (2012-D11-07)

VIII.   MOTIONS OF WHICH NOTICE IS

GIVEN

Moved by Councillor S.E. White

Seconded by Councillor S. Orser

Approve that, pursuant to section 18.2 of the Council Procedure By-law, leave be given for the introduction of an emergent motion with respect to dealing with those situations where a Council Member is charged and/or convicted of a criminal offence.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

8.   Music London Initiative

That the communication dated November 22, 2012, with respect to Orchestra London’s proposal for a Downtown concert hall, BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration for review and assessment in developing its report back on the various investment and economic prosperity proposals.

Moved by Councillor P. Hubert

Approve clauses 1 to 5, inclusive.

15.   Property located at

160 Sunningdale Road West (H-8084)

That, on the recommendation of the Senior Planner, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to the application of Tricar Developments Inc., relating to the property located at 160 Sunningdale Road West:   a)         the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject lands FROM a Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (h - h-100 - h-119 - R9-7(16)

  • H48) Zone, a Holding Residential R4 (h - h-100 - R4-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-100 - R1-5) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-100 - R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-82 - h-94 - R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-94 - h-100 - R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-94 - h-100 - R1-6) Zone TO a Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (h-100 - R9-7(16) - H48) Zone, to remove the h. and h-119 holding provisions; and,   b)         the application to change the zoning of a portion of the subject lands FROM a Holding Residential R9 Special Provision (h-100 - R9-7(16) H48) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-100 - R1-5) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-100 - R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-82 - h-94 - R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-94 - h-100 - R1-6) Zone, a Holding Residential R1 (h - h-94 - h-100 - R1-6) Zone and a Holding Residential R4 (h - h-100 - R4-6) Zone TO a Residential R9 Special Provision (R9-7(16) - H48) Zone Residential R1 (R1-5) Zone, a Residential R1 (R1-6) Zone, a Residential R1 (R1-6) Zone, a Residential R1 (R1-6) Zone, a Residential R1 (R1-6) Zone and a Residential R4 (R4-6) Zone, BE DEFERRED until such time as the holding provisions have been addressed to the satisfaction of the City.   (2012-D11-07)

16.   Andover Trails

Subdivision - Phase 4 - Special Provisions (39T-07510)

That, on the recommendation of the Manager, Development Services, the following actions be taken with respect to entering into a subdivision agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and Sifton Properties Limited for the subdivision of land over Part of Lot 35, Concession 2, (Geographic Township of Westminster), City of London, County of Middlesex, situated generally between Southdale Road West and Wharncliffe Road South, municipally known as 1451 Wharncliffe Road South:   a)         the attached Special Provisions to be contained in a Subdivision Agreement between The Corporation of the City of London and  Sifton Properties Limited for the Andover Trails Subdivision, Phase 4 (39T-07510), BE APPROVED;   b)         the Mayor and the City Clerk BE AUTHORIZED to execute this Agreement referred to in part a) above, any amending agreements and all documents required to fulfill its conditions;   c)         the financing for this project BE APPROVED in accordance with the “Source of Financing Report” provided as Schedule “A” and the associated Claims and Revenues provided as Schedule “B” to the associated staff report, dated November 26, 2012;   d)         the Municipal Council BE ADVISED that the anticipated reimbursements from the Capital Works Budget have been negotiated for the cost of a pathway in Park Block 8 in this Plan; it being noted that the estimated cost of the pathway is $6,000; it being further noted that the cost is being limited to a maximum amount of $6,000; and,   it being further noted that prior to execution of the subdivision agreement, final registration of the plan and removal of the holding provisions on the lands within this subdivision, the City will confirm the implications of the request for a Part II Order on the Municipal Class EA Study for the Pincombe Drain Storm/Drainage and Drain Restoration.      (2012-D26-05)

17.   Fire at 1156 Dundas

Street

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official, the report, dated November 26, 2012, relating to the recent fire at 1156 Dundas Street, BE RECEIVED. (2012-P09-00)

18.   4th Report of the

Advisory Committee on the Environment

That, the following actions be taken with respect to the 4th Report of the Advisory Committee on the Environment (ACE) from its meeting held on November 7, 2012:   a)         the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to provide the Thames River/Creek Survey Annual Report to the Advisory Committee on the Environment (ACE); it being noted that the ACE received a presentation from A. Van Rossum, Environmental Services Engineer, with respect to the Thames River Annual Report; and,   b)         that clauses 2 through 6, inclusive, of the 4th Report of the ACE, BE RECEIVED AND NOTED.

19.   4th Report of the

London Advisory Committee on Heritage

That, the following actions be taken with respect to the 4th Report of the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) from its meeting held on November 14, 2012:   a)         the following actions be taken with respect to the Stewardship Sub-Committee report:   i)              the Heritage Planner BE REQUESTED to forward the Statement of Significance, for the property located at 3378 Homewood Lane, to the owner for signature;   ii)             the  Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) does not have sufficient reason to designate the property located at 75 Bathurst Street;   iii)            an expenditure of up to $100.00 BE APPROVED, for refreshments to be provided at the Stewardship Sub-Committee meeting to be held on December 5, 2012, with public history students from the University of Western Ontario; it being noted that the LACH has sufficient funds in its 2012 budget for this expenditure; and,   iv)        the Stewardship Sub-Committee minutes from its meeting held on October 31, 2012, BE RECEIVED;   b)         the  Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage (LACH) does not have sufficient reason to designate the property located at 1523 Bradley Avenue; it being noted that the LACH requested that the Heritage Planner be allowed to document the building and that all salvageable heritage aspects of the property be retained; it being further noted that the LACH heard a verbal presentation from D. Menard, Heritage Planner, with respect to this matter;   c)            on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit application of G. & M. Baumann, requesting permission for window replacement to the designated heritage property located at 195 Elmwood Avenue East, BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposed window replacement and has advised that the impact of such alteration on the heritage features of the property identified in the reasons for designation, is acceptable; it being further noted that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage heard a verbal presentation from P. Molloy, Duo Construction, with respect to this matter;   d)         on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit application of New Brighton Housing Co-op, requesting permission for an alteration to the designated heritage property located at 473 Baker Street, BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposed alteration and has advised that the impact of such alterations on the heritage features of the property, identified in the reasons for designation, is acceptable; it being further noted that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage heard verbal presentations from L. Baker and M. Simpson, with respect to this matter;   e)         on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit application of E. Greenfield, requesting permission for a roof material replacement to the designated heritage property located at 986 Richmond Street, BE APPROVED and that the owner BE ASKED to salvage the reusable slate; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposed replacement and has advised that the impact of such alteration on the heritage features of the property, identified in the reasons for designation, is acceptable;   f)         on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the Heritage Alteration Permit application of the City of London, requesting permission for an alteration to the designated heritage property located at 10 Meadowlily Road South, BE APPROVED; it being noted that the Heritage Planner has reviewed the proposed alteration and has advised that the impact of such alteration on the heritage features of the property, identified in the reasons for designation, is acceptable; it being further noted that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage heard verbal presentations from T. Fediv, AECOM and K. Grabowski, Transportation Design Engineer, City of London, with respect to this matter;   g)         the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to prepare an integrated plaque for the heritage features of the entire Meadowlily area, including the former mill;   h)         that clause 14 of the 4th Report of the LACH, BE AMENDED by adding the words “and that the property located at 283 South Street is a Priority 1 listed building on the 2006 Inventory of Heritage Resources”;   i)          that clause 16, of the 4th Report of the LACH, BE AMENDED by deleting the number “527” and replacing it with the number “272”; and,   j)          that clauses 8 through 13, inclusive, clause 15, and clauses 17 to 20, inclusive, of the 4th Report of the LACH, BE RECEIVED AND NOTED;   it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee heard a verbal presentation from G. Goodlet, Chair, LACH, with respect to these matters.

20.   3rd Report of the

Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee

That, the following actions be taken with respect to the 3rd Report of the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee (EEPAC) from its meeting held on November 15, 2012:   a)         the following actions be taken with respect to the Applewood Hills Sergautis Lands located at 660 Sunningdale Road East:   i)              the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner BE REQUESTED to consider, as part of the Official Plan review process, changing the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) process from being development based to a natural heritage system approach; and,   ii)         the attached comments, prepared by the Environmental and Ecological Planning Advisory Committee (EEPAC) Working Group, with respect to the Applewood Hills Sergautis Lands located at 660 Sunningdale Road East, BE FORWARDED to N. McKee, Senior Planner, for her review and consideration;   b)                     that clauses 2 through 25, inclusive, of the 3rd Report of the EEPAC, BE RECEIVED AND NOTED;   it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee did not hear a verbal presentation from D. Sheppard, Chair, EEPAC, with respect to these matters.

22.   Property located at

195 Dundas Street (TZ-8100)

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, based on the application of Millennium Downtown Corporation, relating to the property located at 195 Dundas Street, the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-l, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to extend the Temporary Use (T-54) Zone, which permits a surface commercial parking lot along the Dundas Street frontage, for a period not exceeding three (3) years;   it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication, dated November 22, 2012, from J. MacDonald, Executive Director, Downtown London, with respect to this matter;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individual made an oral submission in connection therewith:   -                     A.R. Patton, Patton, Cormier & Associates, on behalf of the applicant – expressing support for the application.  (2012-D11-05)

23.   Property located at

129 Riverside Drive

That, on the recommendation of the Manager, Development Services and Planning Liaison, the following actions be taken with respect to the site plan approval application of 789220 Ontario Limited, relating to the property located at 129 Riverside Drive:   a)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that at the public meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee held with respect to this matter, the following issues were raised by the neighourhood with respect to the application for Site Plan approval to permit a three storey, twenty-eight unit, apartment building:   i)          the significant loss of trees on the site; ii)          the increase in traffic; and, iii)         the unattractiveness of the proposed building; and,   b)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council supports the granting of approval of the site plan and elevations, as submitted in the Civic Administration’s Report dated November 26, 2012;   it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received a communication, dated November 25, 2012, from J. Price, by e-mail, with respect to this matter;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:   -                    Harry Froussios, Zelinka Priamo Ltd., on behalf of the applicant – responding to the public’s comments; advising that part of the tree removal issue is the installation of a privacy fence that the applicant has agreed to install; and noting that some of the trees to be removed are not healthy. -                    Joe McCarthy, 13 Moir Street – advising that the property is zoned R9 and Office 1; and noting that, in the City’s Official Plan, this is for Office Use only. -                    Peter Maglaris, 150 Mount Pleasant Avenue – expressing concern with the amount of traffic currently travelling along Mount Pleasant Avenue; noting that there is a school bus zone and a church pick up zone in the area; indicating that this will increase the volume of traffic; expressing concern with congestion and children playing in the area; and indicating that the aesthetics of the proposed building are boring and unimaginative. -                     Krissy Dougherty, 162 Mount Pleasant Avenue – enquiring as to the status of the zoning variance.   (2012-D25-00)

24.   Request for Demolition - Property located

at 1523 Bradley Avenue

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the property located at 1523 Bradley Avenue:   a)            the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council does not object to the request for demolition for the Priority 2 listed property located at 1523 Bradley Avenue; and,   b)            the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council does not wish to issue a notice of Intent to Designate this property under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act;   it being noted that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage has been consulted on this request for demolition;   it being pointed out that there were no oral submissions made at the public  participation meeting associated with this matter.  (2012-D10-00)

27.   Property located at 450 Oxford Street West

(OZ-8003)

That, notwithstanding the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the application of Bluestone Properties Inc, relating to the property located at 450 Oxford Street West BE REFERRED to the Civic Administration to report back at a public participation meeting in May, 2013 regarding the following matters:   a)            nothwithstanding the High Density Residential land use designation, an Office Area designation is supportable within the area of the property available for development; and,   b)            the Civic Administration and the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority to identify the flood line;   it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications, with respect to this matter:   -                     a communication, dated November 20, 2012, from J. Johnston, 1114-605 Proudfoot Lane; and, -                     a communication, dated November 19, 2012, from H. Katz, Esam Construction Limited;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:   -                    A.R. Patton, Patton, Cormier and Associates, on behalf of the applicant – expressing opposition to the Civic Administration’s recommendation; indicating that the property is located on the corner of an arterial road and a collector road; noting that the roads are serviced by the London Transit Commission; indicating that the property is fully serviced, with water, storm and sanitary sewer; advising that this area of the city is growing quickly; indicating that this property is designated and zoned for offices and daycares; indicating that it is unfair to say that the proposal needs over 300 parking spaces; indicating that his client has received interest from a bank and offices; indicating that his client only needs 129 parking spaces; requesting that the Committee refer the application to the Civic Administration to prepare an implementing enacting zoning by-law to be brought back to the Committee in January or February of 2013; reiterating that there is no reason to refuse this application; advising that in 2007, Mr. E. Wszol was appointed the Engineer for Mud Creek; indicating that the flood line is a moving target; noting that it is not rocket science; advising that the line should be able to be nailed down; indicating that parking can be permitted; advising that the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority comments are not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement; indicating that bits and pieces of the process have been very frustrating; indicating that his clients were promised the Mud Creek study in 2011; advising that landowners paid for a study to be completed in 2007 out of their own pockets and the City will not release the Study information. -                    Michael Hannay, MBTW Group – advising that a site plan was submitted with the application; indicating that the proposal was submitted to the Urban Design Peer Review Panel in April, 2011; indicating that they have received very positive comments from the Peer Review Panel; indicating that the dotted line on the application is their best guess where the flood line is; indicating that the issue of the scale is uncertain; advising that the proposed building is close to the street; noting that it is a strong, forward looking building with a high level of finish on all sides; and reading the “Discussion” section of page 351 of the Planning and Environment Committee agenda. -                    Ed Wszol, Designated Consulting Engineer, Development Engineering – indicating that the flood line has been a fluid exercise over the years; indicating that there are ways to mitigate any impact; noting that the Manager of Stormwater verbally referred to work that was proposed earlier in the meeting this evening; noting that the Civic Administration could not come up with a cost effective solution;  further noting that the Civic Administration were presented with five to seven solutions; indicating that the applicant would reconstruct and lower the culvert located under the CN Rail; noting that the culvert was originally constructed in the 1920’s; further noting that the culvert was constructed when the land was used for farm purposes and orchards; indicating that the culvert needs to be rebuilt and they hope to do so with the cooperation of CN Rail; indicating that there is an opportunity to provide for a stormwater management solution; and indicating that they have not been able to review the information provided by Delcan and would like an opportunity to address the Delcan report. -                    Bernie Bierbaum, President and CEO, Bluestone Properties – advising that they have had a lot of patience in dealing with this application; indicating that he has been involved with this for 15 years; advising that his most recent involvement was in 2006/2007; indicating that he attended all three public meetings; advising that ESAM represents the majority of the landowners; indicating that, after the series of public meetings, he thought the development was moving forward; noting that there has been no movement; indicating that the flood line going down is good news for them; advising that he met with the Stormwater Management Unit in 2012; indicating that the Civic Administration was going to provide the flood plain information to Stantec by November, 2010; noting that, to date, no information has been received from the Civic Administration; advising that he met with former City Manager, Jeff Fielding, to try to resolve this issue; indicating that, in February, 2011, the Corporate Approvals Team met on this issue; indicating that the Stormwater Management Unit indicated that it could have the information within seven months; advising that he went ahead and worked with the Consultants on the application late last year; advising that the information that he was provided in 2007 indicated that the flood line was ok to use for development; advising that he has not received the information that he was promised; requesting that the application be approved; and asking to work with the Civic Administration on this application. -                    A. M. Valastro, 1-133 John Street – indicating that the floodplain is occupied by deer, geese and goslings; advising that it is a wildlife corridor; indicating that a fast talking lawyer wants to put through development; advising that deer are showing up downtown as there is no longer a buffer; advising that these places are very valuable; and indicating that she does not want to see a pushy lawyer twisting the Councillors arms. -                    Jean Johnston, 1114-605 Proudfoot Lane – advising that she has lived in her residence for 18 years; agreeing that the area is a wildlife corridor; indicating that Mud Creek currently floods; reading the communication she submitted on the Added Agenda; indicating that there are deer, rabbits, squirrels, chipmunks and a pair of snapping turtles in the area; advising that ever year, ducks land in the swimming pool in Forest Hill and are removed; indicating that it is a marvelous area; noting that the Creek needs some cleaning up; advising that she knows the difference between Oak and Maple trees. -                     Jeff Brick, Upper Thames River Conservation Authority – advising that the Provincial Policy Statement, the City’s Policies and the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority policies do no allow development in floodplains; noting that parking is development; advising that there is no firm indication for the floodplain; indicating that modeling needs to be completed; advising that the City cannot advise on the elevation; advising that the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority needs to peer review the application; and advising that they will provide the floodplain information once they have it.   (2012-D11-01)

28.   Demolition Request - Property located at 75

Bathurst Street

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, with the advice of the Heritage Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the property located at 75 Bathurst Street:   a)            the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council does not object to the request for demolition for the Priority 1 listed property located at 75 Bathurst Street; and,   b)         the Managing Director, Development and Compliance Services & Chief Building Official BE ADVISED that the Municipal Council does not wish to issue a notice of Intent to Designate this property under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act;   it being noted that the London Advisory Committee on Heritage has been consulted on this request for demolition;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individual made an oral submission in connection therewith:   -                  Tanya Park, 300 South Street, President, SOHO Community Association – expressing support for the application.  (2012-D10-00)

30.   Beaufort/Irwin/Gunn/Saunby/Essex

(“BIGS”) Street Neighbourhood Plan

That, the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to report back at a future public participation meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee with a final Beaufort/Irwin/Gunn/Saunby/Essex (BIGS) Street Neighbourhood Plan, with respect to the following:   a)            investigate the residents’ concerns expressed at the public participation meeting held on Monday, November 26, 2012;   b)            take into consideration the comments received from agencies and other City Departments; and,   c)            further consultation be undertaken with the affected neighours;   it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications, with respect to this matter:   -                     a communication, dated November 12, 2012, from D. & T. Gonyou, 350 Wharncliffe Road North; -                     communications, dated November 19 and 23, 2012, from S. Scott, 372 Cedar Avenue; -                     a communication, dated November 22, 2012, from P. & H. Cortese, 383 Cedar Avenue; -                     a communication, dated November 23, 2012, from M. & B. Nolan, 396 Cedar Avenue; -                     a communication, dated November 12, 2012, from E.A. Smuck, 928 Western Road; -                     a communication, dated November 25, 2012, from C. Crncich, 384 Cedar Avenue; -                     a communication, dated November 25, 2012, from J. & R. Carvalho, 388 Cedar Avenue; -                     a communication from W.H. Liu, 390 Cedar Avenue; and, -                     a communication, dated November 23, 2012, from R. Salazar, 376 Wharncliffe Road North;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:   -                     Edgar Allen Smuck, 928 Western Road – advising that at the community public meeting, there were three plans presented; noting that they were the preserve model, the urban model and the village model; advising that the community rejected the village model; indicating that an on-site manager should be required for cluster dwellings; enquiring as to whether people want to see the area remain the same, whether people want to see real change or whether or not people want to see Mr. Smith’s village plan that was rejected by the community; indicating that he supports the high rise plan; noting that there is one developer willing to build in this area; advising that the area was enlarged to allow the increase in the  Western University to be managed; referring to the 2008 Wynfield case; and advising that he provided Mr. C. Parker, Senior Planner, with a 21-page communication on why Mr. P. Smith’s report should be rejected. -                     Morrison Reid, 376 Wharncliffe Road North – advising that he is a business owner; advising that the residents need more time to read the Peter J. Smith Report as the residents living outside of the Beaufort Street, Irwin Street, Gunn Street and Saunby Street area did not know they were included in the Neighbourhood Plan; advising that, approximately 15 years ago, an application for a high rise in this area was rejected by the Ontario Municipal Board; indicating that this Plan would destabilize a stable community; indicating that the Peter J. Smith report is flawed; and indicating that many of the houses are owner occupied. -                     Sheila Scott, 372 Cedar Avenue – advising that she has happily lived there for 40 years; requesting that the Wharncliffe Road and Cedar Avenue area be protected and be preserved; indicating that a majority of the people in the Wharncliffe Road/Cedar Avenue area did not know that they were included in the study area; advising that she has attended both community meetings; indicating that the community was provided with three models to choose from; and indicating that the whole study involves students; and enquiring as to whether or not any students have been consulted on this matter. -                     Rosine Salazer, 376 Wharncliffe Road North – advising that she has respectfully lived near students for years; indicating that the single family dwellings should remain single family dwellings; requesting that the Committee drive by their properties to see that they are ranches, not cottages; and advising that the Peter J. Smith report includes the bike path along Wharncliffe Road which leads to the Thames River; and noting that the bike path leads to a cliff. -                     Glen Matthews, on behalf of Gitta Kulczycki, Vice-President, Resources and Operations, Western University – see attached communication. -                     Jackson Carvalho, 388 Cedar Avenue – advising that he has lived in his residence for 17 years; indicating that the document that the City is using has no credibility as the information is wrong; and advising that other owners live in the area; noting that the study indicates that the area is not owner occupied. -                     Anna Maria Valastro, 1-133 John Street – advising that, earlier in the meeting, there was a similar issue in North London; indicating that it is only a priority to the City if the area is owner occupied; advising that the renters of the properties are not notified of the meetings; indicating that this happens in every city; and requesting that the City give value to its renters. -                     Wanda Graham, 387 Wharncliffe Road North – advising that she owns a duplex and rents out the other half to a University professor; expressing disagreement with the proposed changes in the Peter J. Smith report; advising that there are student renal signs in the neighbourhood; indicating that the Smith report is incorrect; and advising that the area backing onto Gibbons Park is all owner occupied. -                     Christine Crncich, 384 Cedar Avenue – indicating that she was away most of the summer; expressing alarm upon reading the report; indicating that she has the poor condition home on the street; noting that she sided her house in board and batton; indicating that she has deer and foxes eat from her garden every day; advising that she is proud to have the woods, the River and the deer; indicating that she likes to stay hidden; indicating that they do not have street lights and their street does not get plowed; enquiring as to how the most disagreed on Plan is the one that was chosen; requesting the Councillors drive through the neighbourhood at night to see the stars; indicating that, from her property on, all 32 of the houses were counted as rental properties; indicating that one of her neighbours has won the Trillium Award seven years for her beautiful gardens; indicating that no one in her area received the notice as all properties were thought to be rentals; indicating that she did not know that Essex Street and Hollywood Avenue was included in the Study; and enquiring as to who hired Peter J. Smith with her tax dollars. -                     Dan McFadden, Real Estate Agent – advising that there are beautiful houses on Cedar Avenue; indicating that the area has deep value; advising that the last two sales in the area sold for $1,200,000; indicating that the houses in the Beaufort Street, Irwin Street, Gunn Street and Saunby Street area that he has torn down have been condemned; and indicating that he was one of the first to build new houses in this area. -                     Andre G., 371 Cedar Avenue – advising that the has owned this property for three years; noting that he purchased the property as an investment; indicating that he has spent a lot of money in renovations; indicating that the area is beautiful; advising that he was about to ask his tenants to leave so that he could move in when they advised him that they were moving out; and advising that this area is too beautiful to change. -                     Annette Lance, 72 Gunn Street – requesting some control and balance in the neighbourhood; indicating that the City Council is doing the neighbourhood residents a disservice; indicating that a lot of mature trees will be removed if Mr. Peter J. Smith’s recommendations are implemented; advising that the setback is closer to the street than the existing homes on the street; advising that one of the developments that was built had to resize the foundation as the foundation was too large and the neighbours called and complained; indicating that the neighbourhood is a lost cause; and expressing home that other neighbourhoods have more success. -                     James Corcoran, 43 Gunn Street – indicating that the study was not their idea; advising that, in a short time, eight oversize duplexes have been built in the Beaufort Street, Irwin Street, Gunn Street and Saunby Street area; indicating that the neighbourhood is now like the Wild West; indicating that only part of the area is not under floodplain control; indicating that this is the path of least resistance for developers; advising that the few remaining single family houses in the neighbourhood do not fit in with the big box houses; indicating that there is a fourplex and a duplex boxed in beside the Varsity Mills townhouse development; and requesting that the neighbourhood be rezoned from an R2-3 Zone to a R3-2 Zone.    (2012-D11-00)

31.   Old East Village Enhanced Incentives

Programs

That the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to report to the appropriate Committee with respect to the financial implications of granting a two year extension of the Forgivable Upgrade to Building Code Loan Program and the Forgivable Façade Improvement Loan Program to the Old East Village Business Improvement Area and Downtown London;   it being noted that the Planning and Environment Committee reviewed and received the following communications, with respect to this matter:   -                    a communication from K. Keane, Chair, Old East Village Business Improvement Area; and, -                    a communication, dated November 20, 2012, from J. MacDonald, Executive Director, Downtown London, with respect to this matter;   it being pointed out that the Planning and Environment Committee received the attached presentation from Clark Bryant, Board Member, Old East Village Business Improvement Area, with respect to this matter.   (2012-F12-00)

32.   Dalmagarry Road

That the Civic Administration BE REQUESTED to report to a future meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee with respect to an update on the status of the completion of Dalmagarry Road and the reason for the delay.

21.   Property located at 124 St. James Street

That, on the recommendation of the Manager, Development Planning, the following actions be taken with respect to the site plan approval application of London Property Corporation, relating to the property located at 124 St. James Street:   a)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that at the public meeting of the Planning and Environment Committee held with respect to this matter, the following issues were raised by the neighourhood with respect to the application for Site Plan approval to permit two, three and one-half storey thirty-six unit apartment buildings with each unit containing three bedrooms:   i)              the significant loss of trees on the site; ii)             the addition of windows and dormers to the proposed development; iii)            the possible groundwater contamination; and, iv)           the stability of the ground for the proposed development; and,   b)         the Approval Authority BE ADVISED that, upon the applicant fulfilling the areas of concern noted in part a) above, the Municipal Council supports the granting of approval of the site plan and elevations, as submitted in the Civic Administration’s Report dated November 26, 2012; and,   c)         the Civic Administration BE DIRECTED to meet with the Ward Councillor and the Neighbourhood Community Association to address the concerns identified at the public participation meeting;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:   -                    Harry Froussios, Zelinka Priamo Ltd., on behalf of the applicant – advising that they have had discussions with the residents, the Community Association and the Civic Administration; indicating that an application for minor variance was applied for and has been appealed; advising that the core of the neighbourhood supports the application; advising that the reports that have been submitted permit the development to proceed; indicating that they asked for a one metre height variance; indicating that the second building could be higher; indicating that the proposal is in keeping with the neighbourhood; and that the applicant will endeavor to retain the existing trees without compromising the development. -                    Anna Maria Valastro, 1–133 John Street – advising that she lives just outside of this area; indicating that she has requested that the hydrology and soil density reports be released to the public; noting that, in the Engineering Report, the ground is not stable due to its proximity to the flood plain; indicating that the proposed development is being forced; indicating that the project has failed to look at the impacts on the roots of existing trees; indicating that the project will contaminate the groundwater; requesting that the surplus parking spaces not be built to allow the existing trees to remain; reiterating that there are two city trees that are not to be removed; requesting that the black walnut tree not be removed, but that the building be built around the tree; advising that the development is exclusionary; indicating that the development should be welcoming to everyone; and requesting that a second meeting be held with respect to this matter. -                    Nancy Whynot, 428 St. George Street – advising that the proposed design seems more inclined to arterial roads; and advising that it does not fit where it is being proposed. -                    Mary Cave, 220 St. George Street – expressing support for the groundwater and floodplain concerns that were previously mentioned; advising that the structure is unattractive for the area that it is proposed to be built in; indicating that St. George Street is becoming an artery for people travelling west on Oxford Street or east onto Talbot Street; indicating that the four-way stop at St. George Street is tenuous; and expressing concern with traffic only having one entrance and exit on the proposed development. -                     Tom Miles, 114 Sydenham Street – advising that the proposed student residences are identical to the student rentals located on Wharncliffe Road; expressing concern that the proposed development is not on a main artery, but now in a residential neighbourhood; indicating that you will always be able to retain students; advising that people who want to live in Old North, and have always lived in Old North, are now living in apartments in Old North; indicating that a four storey building on a two lane street is overwhelming; advising that the trees are jewels the City should want to maintain; indicating that the Ivey family is a wonderful family for the City; noting that they have owned many homes in North London; indicating that he has met with Mr. Stanton and requested that the residential be built prior to the student housing; expressing praise for the Grosvenor Community Association who realized that they were unable to stop the development; and advising that the Community Association does not represent everyone in the area.    (2012-D25-00)

Moved by Councillor S.E. White

Seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan

Amend clause 21, in line 1 of part b), by deleting the word “fulfilling” and by replacing it with the words “addressing”.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

The motion to Approve clause 21, as amended, is put.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

25.   Properties located at 510, 518 and 526

Southdale Road East (Z-8092)

That, on the recommendation of the Managing Director, Planning and City Planner, the following actions be taken with respect to the application of Dr. Afzal Mohammed, relating to the properties located at 510, 518 and 526 Southdale Road East:   a)            the attached proposed by-law BE INTRODUCED at the Municipal Council meeting to be held on December 11, 2012, to amend Zoning By-law No. Z.-1, (in conformity with the Official Plan), to change the zoning of the subject property FROM a Residential R3 Office Conversion (R3-2/OC5) Zone at 510 Southdale Road East and a Residential R3 (R3-2) Zone at 518, 526 Southdale Road East, which permits single detached dwellings, semi-detached dwellings, duplex dwellings, triplex dwellings, converted dwellings, and fourplex dwellings in the R3-2 Zone and dwelling units, medical/dental offices in existing buildings and offices in existing buildings in the OC5 Zone TO a Restricted Office Special Provision (RO2(  )) Zone, which permits clinics, medical/dental offices, medical/dental laboratories and offices including a minimum parking setback of 15 meters from the ultimate road allowance; and,   b)            the Site Plan Approval Authority BE REQUESTED to address the following design issues through the site plan process:   i)          a site plan identifying phases of development, and a landscape plan which identifies continuous screening of parking areas along the Southdale Road frontage, to provide an attractive street edge condition, until the frontage is occupied by built form; ii)         ensure landscaping along Nixon Avenue screens adjacent parking areas from the street; it being noted that this may include a low-rise wall clad with materials also used on the building, in addition to plantings; iii)         provide or relocate an entrance at the street corner “two storey commercial building” to offer convenient pedestrian access from the street intersection; iv)        ensure a street corner height element is provided in the street corner “two storey commercial building” and articulated sufficiently to identify it as a special focal element at the street intersection; v)         provide or relocate an entrance on the “medical building” facing Southdale Road to offer convenient pedestrian access from the sidewalk; vi)        include landscaping techniques along the Southdale Road frontage, such as a paved forecourt and a broad sidewalk between buildings, to create functional and pleasant pedestrian connections between the building entrances and public sidewalks; and, vii)       consider the October 17, 2012 advice of the Urban Design Peer Review Panel to maximize the qualitative contribution the development makes in the enhancement of the street corner location;   it being pointed out that at the public participation meeting associated with this matter, the following individuals made oral submissions in connection therewith:   -                    Laverne Kirkness, Kirkness Consulting Inc., on behalf of the applicant – expressing support for the application; advising that they have worked with the Civic Administration and the Urban Design Review Panel throughout the application process; indicating that during the site plan process, special provision was made to plant trees along the property line to ensure that the people abutting the property would see a fence and backdropped landscaping; advising that the proposed development conforms to the Urban Design Review requirements; indicating that the application is in conformity with the Official Plan; and advising that there is a good demand for medical/dental at this corner. -                     John Collins, 537 Winblest Avenue – expressing opposition to the application; indicating that his father built the house he now resides in; indicating that the house was in the middle of nowhere when it was first built; indicating that the subdivision is comprised of ½ acre lots; indicating that the current residents were not expecting houses at their backyards when they purchased their properties; advising that, across the street, half of the mall is empty and wondering why that space cannot be used instead; indicating that, 10 years ago, his father fought against the building of a gas station in the area; advising that this affects the entire subdivision; indicating that there is a group home moving into the area; noting that the people they back onto will not be looking at a parking lot; reiterating that this is not necessary, there is lots of room in the mall; advising that residents on Winblest Avenue are going to be looking at an 8 foot fence along the back of their properties; indicating that there is a Rexall on the other side of the street; indicating that the applicant is proposing to tear down houses to build new houses; and indicating that if you allow this on one corner, you need to allow it all down the street.   (2012-D11-05)

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

26.   Property located at 1205 Riverside Drive

(39CD-12512/Z-8099)

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

29.   Property located at 2095 Coronation Drive

(Z-8076)

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor D. Brown

Approve clauses 1 to 11, inclusive.

X.   DEFERRED

MATTERS

XI.   ENQUIRIES

XII.   EMERGENT

MOTIONS

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Approve leave to introduce a motion related to a reception for the presentation of the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee medals pursuant to section 11.4 of the Council Procedure By-law.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor H.L. Usher

Seconded by Councillor D. Brown

Approve that the City Clerk BE DIRECTED to make the necessary arrangements to hold a reception, prior to February 28, 2013, to present Queen’s Diamond Jubilee medals to all recipients nominated by by Municipal Council.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

XIII.   BY-LAWS

BY-LAWS TO BE READ A FIRST, SECOND AND THIRD TIME:

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor S. Orser

Approve 1st reading of Bill No. 31.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor S. Orser

Approve 2nd reading of Bill No. 31.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor H.L. Usher

Seconded by Councillor D. Brown

Approve 3rd reading and enactment of Bill No. 31.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Seconded by Councillor S. Orser

Approve 1st reading of Bill No. 3.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor S. Orser

Seconded by Councillor D. Brown

Approve 2nd reading of Bill No. 3.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor S. Orser and seconded by Councillor P. Van Meerbergen

Approve 3rd reading and enactment of Bill No. 3.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor M. Brown

Seconded by Councillor J.B. Swan

Approve leave to introduce the added by-laws.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor M. Brown

Seconded by Councillor D. Brown

Approve 1st reading of Bill Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 30, inclusive, and Bill Nos. 32 to 34.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor M. Brown

Seconded by Councillor J.P. Bryant

Approve 2nd reading of Bill Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 30, inclusive, and Bill Nos. 32 to 34.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

Moved by Councillor B. Polhill

Seconded by Councillor H.L. Usher

Approve 3rd reading of Bill Nos. 1, 2, 4 to 30, inclusive, and Bill Nos. 32 to 34.

Motion Passed

Motion Passed

XIV.   ADJOURNMENT